May 10, 2007

  • Inquiring Minds Don't Really Want to Know

    Somehow, one of Matt's best friends (and also Best Man at our wedding) turned 40 last month.  So we celebrated by going to the city of Sin, and hemorrhaging money for 4 days.  It was interesting while we were there that politics really didn't enter into our conversation, and when it did, I knew to keep it civil.  It's really hard because, people always ask me where I'm from.  And where I'm "from" leads to a discussion of South Asian politics.  And no one wants to hear about my views on politics, especially because it involves terrorism in Southeast Asia.  And terrorists are so out of vogue.  One would prefer to hear about reality TV shows at the dinner table, apparently.

    Matt's friends are quite liberal.  I would have thought liberals would want to know what's going on in the world around them.  But I was wrong.

    Radical ostriches.


    Wed May 9, 11:28 AM ET

    NARATHIWAT, Thailand (AFP) - Seven soldiers were killed Wednesday in a
    bomb attack by separatist insurgents in Thailand's restive south,
    military and police said.

    The soldiers were returning from a training session in an army pick-up
    truck when insurgents remotely detonated a 20-kilogramme (45-pound)
    roadside bomb near a school in Narathiwat province.

    The military report into the incident said that insurgents opened fire
    after the bomb exploded to ensure all the troops were dead, before
    snatching the soldiers' M16 rifles.

    Police in the area said the militants had scattered spikes on the road
    to prevent rescue workers from reaching the scene of the blast, which
    left a two-metre (six-foot) wide crater.

    The soldiers were part of a military programme that was supposed to
    work to improve relations with residents of the region, police added.

    from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070509/wl_asia_afp/thailandsouthunrest

    When did the word "insurgent" come to mean "terrorist"?  A rose by any other name is still a rose.

    It's interesting that they fail to mention the religion of these insurgents.  Perhaps they're scared that someone might draw a conclusion?  By failing to mention the religion of these insurgents, they seem to acknowledge that some people can actually add 1 + 1.


    Compared to the Thaksin government, General Surayud has
    been far more active in trying to tackle violence in the south, which
    is widely blamed on an Islamic insurgency. He has visited the region
    and offered to negotiate with the rebels, something his predecessor
    never did.

    But these efforts do not seem to have made any
    difference on the ground, where the bombings and drive-by shootings
    continue almost daily.


    Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont - archive photo

    Gen Surayud's record in office has been mixed

    "Policy-wise, this government has done the right thing
    in the south, but implementing the policies they have come up with is
    another thing," said security analyst Panitan Wattanayagorn.

    from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6234439.stm

    What's wrong with saying it?  They're militant Muslims.  They don't want negotiation.  They don't care about diplomacy.  They speak with the sword.  One can fund their political science courses at U.C. Berkeley, but although you can lead a horse to water, you just can't
    make it drink.

    So many cliches.  And yet people still don't get it.  Amazing.

    Peace only works if both sides want it.  This isn't a schoolyard, where one can run to the teacher when a bully strikes.  In the real world, the aggressor wins the lunch money.  Apparently, this is something that neither American nor Thai kids learn in schools anymore.

    Amnesty only works if you have the upper hand.


    Surayud has seen an amnesty work

    The idea is good, but the govt needs to avoid taking a legalistic approach on who is eligible

    The idea to grant amnesty to militants in the far South is a
    positive gesture for national reconciliation and the restoration of
    peace in the troubled region - but only if the military-installed
    government is able to fine-tune the process.

    Prime
    Minister Surayud Chulanont got the idea from Fourth Army Region
    Commander Viroj Buacharoon. The same concept was used successfully to
    weaken the Communist movement in the 1980s by granting fighters amnesty
    and welcoming them back home to help develop the nation.

    Article
    7 of the now abolished anti-Communist law, granted amnesty for members
    of the Communist movement who joined the insurgency in the jungle
    without committing any crimes.

    The amnesty imposed with
    Prime Minister's Order 66/2523, during Prem Tinsulanonda's
    administration, aided political efforts to defeat the Communists.

    Prime
    Minister Surayud Chulanont, who was then a junior soldier, probably got
    a good impression from that triumph, as he saw a massive defection of
    Communist fighters - notably former student activists who joined the
    Communists after the massacre at Thammasat University in October 1976 -
    emerge from the jungle in the early 1980s.

    ***

    However, the current situation in the restive South is totally different from Prem's time.

    The
    militants have completely changed from those that Thai officials
    confronted previously. In the 1980s, the government had a clear picture
    of what Communists - and later, separatists - looked like. Their
    guerrilla wars might have had their own rules but it was not beyond the
    ability of a uniformed army to take them on.

    ***

    The
    new generation of southern militants is a different story and the
    government, both the current and the previous administration, has never
    treated them as an enemy in a war - but merely culprits who commit
    crimes against security forces, and sometimes simply against individual
    security officials.

    ***

    From a
    legal point of view, those who surfaced to create violence in the
    restive region were people who clearly committed crimes. Killings,
    shooting, bombing and arson are all crimes under the Penal Code.

    For those who have not yet committed a violent crime - an amnesty is unnecessary.

    However, the boundary between crime and terrorism in the context of the deep South is blurred.

    It
    remains unclear as to whether people who have not killed others, but
    are accused of masterminding violence in the predominantly Muslim
    region - such as Spae-ing Basoh, the former principal of Thammawithaya
    school in Yala - should be able to apply for amnesty.

    The
    fugitive Spae-ing, with a Bt10 million bounty on his head, is wanted in
    connection with many violent crimes in the restive south, but his
    arrest warrant doesn't say he has killed anybody or planted any bombs
    himself.

    If the authorities take a criminal view of him, the amnesty might not be applicable.

    However,
    one group that should apply for Surayud's amnesty are the militants'
    supporters and sympathisers, who helped provide logistics, distributed
    anti-government leaflets, lay spiked nails along roads or staged
    demonstrations to demand the release of suspected militants.

    However,
    if authorities are strict about criminal laws as they were previously,
    these people would be supporters of crime, and so an amnesty would not
    help them get off the hook.

    The amnesty is not a bad idea,
    however, if the government takes a new perspective and does not act
    like the police in assessing people's involvement from a criminal point
    of view.

    It is worth considering amnesty for people like
    Spae-ing also, if the authorities believe he is an influential person
    who can manipulate violence in the region - or at least get many young
    militants to listen to him.

    To grant him amnesty would
    also boost the possibility of dialogue between the authorities and
    militant leaders, which could pave the way to end the conflict and
    create real national reconciliation.

    Supalak Ganjanakhundee

    The Nation

    from http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2007/05/04/politics/politics_30033356.php

    It's amazing to watch the ease with which the Muslim terrorists get away with murder (literally) in Southern Thailand.  They use power outtages there, just as they do in Iraq.  If it works one place, why not use the same tactic elsewhere?  Like the U.S., eh?


    Wednesday April 18, 1:13 PM

    Bomb blasts cut power in Thai south

    A string of bombs planted by suspected Islamic rebels cut power in
    Thailand's restive south on Wednesday and seriously injured a senior
    police commander.

    Three Buddhist men were also shot dead, with one later beheaded in
    the Muslim-majority southern region where a bloody separatist
    insurgency has killed more than 2,000 people since January 2004.

    Five bomb blasts early Wednesday in Narathiwat province caused a
    power blackout in 80 percent of the provincial capital, local police
    said, with telephone and Internet lines also down. Power was restored
    Wednesday morning.

    Deputy provincial police commander Colonel Noppadon Phueaksomon lost a leg and arm in one of the blasts, police said.

    Three of the bombs exploded in Narathiwat town, while two hit the district of Tak Bai near the Malaysian border.

    "The militants wanted to black-out the whole town," said Colonel Viroj Panichphol, a deputy police commander.

    "Police have instructed security forces to intensify security
    measures for fear that militants may be planning a large scale attack."

    In Narathiwat province late Tuesday, militants shot dead two
    Buddhist men aged 51 and 50. They then beheaded the 50-year-old, police
    said.

    In nearby Pattani province, a 23-year-old police officer was shot dead by suspected militants, also late Tuesday.

    Violence has escalated in the region bordering Malaysia the past six
    months, despite moves by the military-backed government to bring peace
    to the troubled provinces of Yala, Narathiwat and Pattani.

    Junta spokesman Colonel Sunsern Kaewkumnerd told AFP that army chief
    and junta leader General Sonthi Boonyaratglin was in the south
    Wednesday, but was unable to give further details of his visit.

    from http://sg.news.yahoo.com/070418/1/47whv.html

Recent Comments

Categories